Speaking of Padilla (see below), yesterday the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held in Dimaya v. Lynch that “the definition of a ‘crime of violence’ – one of over thirty categories of convictions that constitute an ‘aggravated felony’ under federal immigration law – is unconstitutionally void for vagueness.” Click here to see the ImmigrationProf Blog post about the decision and what it could mean for those of you defending immigrants.
9th Circuit declares “crime of violence” unconstitutionally void for vagueness
{ 0 comments… add one }
Next post: Adoptive stepparent may join parent in filing TPR petition
Previous post: Counsel’s duties after Padilla