City of Oshkosh v. Ernest D. Lehl, 2012AP2717, District 2, 4/24/13; court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity Police had reasonable suspicion to extend a traffic stop and request Lehl to perform field sobriety tests because there were specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably… Read more
admin
State v. Danny F. Anton, 2012AP1165-CR, District 2, 4/23/13; court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); case activity Ineffective assistance of counsel In a fact-specific discussion that precludes summary here, the court of appeals holds Anton’s trial attorney was not ineffective for: failing to object to testimony about telephone calls between Anton and a… Read more
State v. Gerald D. Taylor, 2013 WI 34, on review of court of appeals certification; case activity In a split decision, the supreme court holds that a defendant is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing under the long-established procedure established by State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), even though the… Read more
State v. Taylor continues what the supreme court began in State v. Cross, 2010 WI 70, 326 Wis. 2d 492, 786 N.W.2d 64: Dismantling by implication the well-established Bangert procedures and creating new ways for trial courts to avoid evidentiary hearings on plea withdrawal motions. Taylor’s motion clearly established enough to get an evidentiary hearing under Bangert. (¶75). So why didn’t… Read more
State v. Dyllon A. Maddix, 2013 WI App 64; case activity The warrantless search of an apartment by police who responded to a domestic disturbance call was not justified under the community caretaker doctrine: ¶37 …. Under the facts of this case, after the officers validly exercised the community caretaker function by entering… Read more
Review of unpublished court of appeals decision; case activity Issue (composed by On Point) Did the circuit court’s answer to a question posed by the jury during deliberations allow the jury to base its verdict on speculation and conjecture? Because petitions for review are not available on the court’s website, the issue statement was composed based… Read more
Missouri v. McNeely, USSC No. 11-1425, 4/17/13 United States Supreme Court decision, affirming State v. McNeely, 358 S.W.3d 65 (Mo. 2012) In a decision that works a major change in Wisconsin law governing nonconsensual, warrantless blood draws in OWI cases, the U.S. Supreme Court holds the evanescent quality of alcohol in a suspect’s bloodstream does not in… Read more
State v. Kenneth F. Johnston, 2012AP2427-CR, District 3, 4/16/13; court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity The search of Johnston’s car was supported by probable cause to believe there were open intoxicants in the car: ¶17 In this case, before [Officer] Wojcik searched the vehicle for open intoxicants, Wojcik smelled the odor of… Read more