seventh circuit decision Habeas – Procedural Default Defense: Waiver by State Procedural default (here, failure to perfect the appeal in state court, hence failure to exhaust the claim) is an affirmative defense which may be forfeited or waived by the State. The State expressly waived any failure-to-exhaust objection, hence the court proceeds to the merits… Read more
admin
State v. Noah L., 2012AP348, District 2, 8/29/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity After finding the proof sufficient to support a delinquency allegation, the trial court nonetheless declined to enter adjudication of delinquency, pending a report and recommendation from the Department of Human Services. The report was prepared, which included… Read more
court of appeals publication orders, 8/29/12 On Point posts: 2012 WI App 89 State v. Richard Lavon Deadwiller 2012 WI App 90 State v. Terry G. Vollbrecht 2012 WI App 93 State v. Troy L. Cameron 2012 WI App 95 State v. Brandon M. Melton… Read more
State v. Robert T., 2012AP1110, District 1, 8/28/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity ¶11 Robert argues that because an adoptive resource was not in place for Anthony at the time of the dispositional hearing, the trial court essentially left Anthony without a family and did not make a finding in Anthony’s… Read more
State v. Eric K. Fredlund, 2012AP742-CR, District 2, 8/22/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity An officer’s observation that a vehicle’s headlights “just appear[ed],” such that the officer couldn’t tell if the vehicle had been traveling down the roadway without lights, supported a traffic stop. ¶6 From the deputy’s observation of Fredlund’s vehicle… Read more
State v. Paul J. Mayek, 2012AP398-CR, District 3, 8/21/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity ¶8 Although we have concluded Rasmussen did not seize Mayek until after he approached Mayek’s vehicle, it is impossible to tell from Rasmussen’s testimony precisely when the seizure occurred. Neither the parties, nor the circuit court, appear to… Read more
seventh circuit decision Habeas Review – Right to Counsel – Collateral Attack Resendez litigated an unsuccessful pro se challenge to revocation of his state court parole, on the ground that he had completed service of that sentence therefore wasn’t in fact on parole. Forced to litigate the issue on his own, he argues on federal… Read more
seventh circuit decision Habeas Review – Confessions – Voluntariness Given the deferential nature of habeas review, the state court reasonably determined that a 16-year-old’s confession after 55 hours of interrogation was voluntary: Particularly in light of the highly deferential standard due to the state court, we have no reason to doubt that it took into account all… Read more
