≡ Menu

6. Post-disposition

State v. Ervin Burris, 2004 WI 91, affirming 2002 WI App 262, 258 Wis. 2d. 454, 654 N.W.2d 866For Burris: Joseph L. SommersIssue: Whether a condition of supervised release, that Burris “avoid all conduct … that is not in the best interest of the public’s welfare or your rehabilitation” provided adequate notice that obtaining a… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Reuben Adams v. Macht, 2001 WI App 10, 241 Wis. 2d 28, 623 N.W.2d 215 Issue: Whether the Wisconsin Resource Center policy prohibiting former employees from visiting the institution is enforceable against a patient seeking visits from a former employee who is also the mother of his child. Holding: The policy is reasonable and based… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Dennis R. Thiel (III), 2001 WI App 32, 241 Wis. 2d 465, 626 N.W.2d 26 For Thiel: John D. Lubarsky, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether the trial court properly exercised discretion in refusing the indigent’s request for an independent expert on a § 980.07(1) (1997-98) reexamination. Holding: ¶25 The first use of the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Glenn Allen Thayer, 2001 WI App 51, 241 Wis. 2d 417, 626 N.W.2d 811 For Thayer: Jane K. Smith Issue: Whether the trial court improperly assigned the burden of persuasion to the inmate at the § 980.09(2)(a) probable cause hearing. Holding: The burden of persuasion is assigned to neither party at a §… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Glenn Allen Thayer, 2001 WI App 51, 241 Wis. 2d 417, 626 N.W.2d 811 For Thayer: Jane K. Smith Issue: Whether the patient was entitled to a full evidentiary hearing on release following the reexamination probable cause “paper review.” Holding: ¶26 A full evidentiary hearing was unwarranted. The only evidence before the trial… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Glenn Allen Thayer, 2001 WI App 51, 241 Wis. 2d 417, 626 N.W.2d 811 For Thayer: Jane K. Smith Issue: Whether the lateness of counsel’s appointment, six days before the paper review probable cause hearing, violated due process. Holding: Construing Thayer’s argument to raise a contention that due to lateness of the appointment… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Daniel Williams, 2001 WI App 155 For Williams: Adrienne M. Moore, SPD, Racine Trial Issue: Whether the grant of a petition for supervised release (§ 980.08) can be vacated on the basis of a periodic re-examination report (§ 980.07) which is a mere assessment of the same information utilized during the supervised release… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Keith Alan VanBronkhorst, 2001 WI App 190 For VanBronkhorst: Jack E. Schairer, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether revocation of supervised release from a ch. 980 commitment was properly based on an uncharged rule violation. Holding: ¶9 … “(P)rocedural due process protections afforded in probation or parole revocation proceedings apply to supervised release revocation… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS