≡ Menu

H. Ch. 980, SVPs

State v. Ronald Ransdell, 2001 WI App 202, PFR filed 8/27/01 For Ransdell: Ellen Henak, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue: Whether the automatic initial commitment to institutional care provision, § 980.06, on its face violates substantive due process. Holding: A person challenging the constitutionality of a statute must show its infirmity beyond reasonable doubt; a statute restricting liberty… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Daniel Williams, 2001 WI App 155 For Williams: Adrienne M. Moore, SPD, Racine Trial Issue: Whether the grant of a petition for supervised release (§ 980.08) can be vacated on the basis of a periodic re-examination report (§ 980.07) which is a mere assessment of the same information utilized during the supervised release… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Larry J. Sprosty, 2001 WI App 231, PFR filed For Sprosty: Jack E. Schairer, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether the trial court erred in refusing to qualify a social worker as an expert in this Ch. 980 supervised release proceeding. Holding: Because the witness had “expertise with respect to treating sex offenders …… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State ex rel. Ruven Seibert v. Macht, 2001 WI 67, 244 Wis. 2d 378, 627 N.W.2d 881, reconsideration denied2002 WI 12, reversing unpublished court of appeals order For Seibert: Gregory P. Seibold; amicus brief: Howard B. Eisenberg, Dean, Marquette Law School Issue/Holding: ¶1. This case presents two issues. The first issue is whether an indigent… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Larry J. Sprosty, 2001 WI App 231, PFR filed For Sprosty: Jack E. Schairer, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether a psychologist must be licensed in Wisconsin to provide expert opinion in a Ch. 980 proceeding. Holding: No: “the standard for determining the admissibility of expert testimony in this case is the general one… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Keith Alan VanBronkhorst, 2001 WI App 190 For VanBronkhorst: Jack E. Schairer, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether revocation of supervised release from a ch. 980 commitment was properly based on an uncharged rule violation. Holding: ¶9 … “(P)rocedural due process protections afforded in probation or parole revocation proceedings apply to supervised release revocation… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Glenn Allen Thayer, 2001 WI App 51, 241 Wis. 2d 417, 626 N.W.2d 811 For Thayer: Jane K. Smith Issue: Whether the commitment subject has a right to present an independent medical report at a petition for discharge probable cause hearing, § 980.09(2)(a). Holding:  Although a Ch. 980 patient does have the right… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Dennis R. Thiel (I), 2000 WI 67, 235 Wis. 2d 823, 612 N.W.2d 94, on certification from court of appeals For Thiel: John D. Lubarsky, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether the ch. 980 respondent waived his objection to insufficient proof by absence of objection. Holding: “(T)he subject of a commitment petition under ch… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS