State v. Eric James Hendrickson, 2010AP1181, District 3/4, 3/10/11 court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Hendrickson: Jefren E. Olsen, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity Under State v. Laxton, 2002 WI 82, 254 Wis. 2d 185, 647 N.W.2d 784, proof of a mental disorder implicitly proves requisite risk of sexually violent recidivism (“serious… Read more
H. Ch. 980, SVPs
State v. Kenneth R. Parrish, 2010AP809, District 1, 2/15/11 court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication); for Parrish: Ellen Henak, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate; case activity; Parrish BiC; State Resp.; Reply SVP – Petition for Discharge – Request for Independent Examiner Parrish’s failure to unequivocally request appointment of an independent examiner dooms his argument… Read more
State v. Lee Alexander Brown, 2010AP970, District 1, 2/1/11 court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication); for Brown: Russell D. Bohach; case activity; Brown BiC; State Resp. The court holds that Brown knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to counsel at trial on his sexually violent person petition. Although there is a question as to… Read more
decision below: unpublished; for West: Ellen Henak, SPD. Milwaukee Appellate; case activity Issue (formulated by On Point): Whether, as a matter of statutory construction, due process and equal protection, the burden of proof on a § 980.08(4)(cg) petition for supervised release of a sexually violent release is on the State. A technical issue, but one significant… Read more
7th circuit decision; habeas review of State v. Martin, No. 06AP2413 Habeas – Filing Deadline – SVP Martin’s habeas challenge to denial of his ch. 980 petition for discharge isn’t time-barred by the fact he could have raised the same challenge to his original commitment. Discharge typically requires a new determination of whether the SVP’s condition has… Read more
State v. Richard D. Sugden, 2010 WI App 166 (recommended for publication); for Sugden: Donald T. Lang, SPD, Madison Appellate; Sugden BiC; State Resp.; Reply Newly Discovered Evidence – Test – Generally ¶14 In order to be entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, Sugden must prove by clear and convincing evidence… Read more
State v. Christopher Melendrez, 2009AP2070, District 4, 9/2/10 court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication); for Melendrez: David R. Karpe; BiC; Resp.; Reply SVP – Retroactivity of Qualifying Offense Legislation Third-degree sexual assault wasn’t an SVP-qualifying offense when Melendrez plea-bargained a reduction of 2nd-degree sexual assault to 3rd. But by the time he… Read more
State v. Walter Allison, Jr., 2010 WI App 103; for Allison: Ellen Henak, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate; BiC; Resp.; Reply Summary judgment in favor of discharge isn’t an available option under § 980.09. ¶18 Applying the principles governing statutory interpretation to Wis. Stat. § 980.09, it is clear that the legislature explicitly prescribed a different procedure from those… Read more
