≡ Menu

7. Confession suppressed

on review of unpublished decision; for Martin: Byron C. Lichstein; case activity; prior post Miranda – “Interrogation”  Issue (composed by On Point): Whether an exchange between Martin and an officer was the functional equivalent of “interrogation” so as to require interrogation. The facts, very briefly, as taken from the court of appeals’ decision: Martin was under arrest… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Brad E. Forbush, 2011 WI 25, reversing 2010 WI App  11; for Forbush: Craig A. Mastantuono, Rebecca M. Coffee; amicus: Colleen D. Ball, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate; case activity Forbush’s 6th amendment right to counsel had already attached – because a criminal complaint had been filed – and he had retained counsel before officers began interrogating him on… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Dionicia M., 2010 WI App 134; for Dionicia M.: Andrew Hinkel, SPD Madison Appellate Recorded Confessions The juvenile was in custody when she was directed to the locked back seat of a patrol car so that she could be transported back to school after being reported truant; and, because it was feasible under… Read more

{ 0 comments }

court of appeals decision (1-judge; not for publication); BiC; Resp. Br.; Reply Br. Miranda – Traffic Stop – Marijuana Odor and Probable Cause Suppression of passenger’s statement due to custodial interrogation without Miranda warnings leaves police without probable cause to arrest driver: ¶7        First, we will address the State’s argument that Kohel’s statement “[w]e just… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Pre-Miranda Silence

State v. Thomas S. Mayo, 2007 WI 78, affirming unpublished opinion For Mayo: Keith A. Findley, UW Law School Issue/Holding: ¶46      We agree with Mayo’s position, and the State’s concession at oral argument, that the prosecutor’s remarks on Mayo’s pre-Miranda silence, and the testimony she elicited in that regard, during the State’s opening statement and case-in-chief, violated Mayo’s… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Matthew J. Knapp (I), 2003 WI 121, on certification; vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Patane, 542 U. S. ____ (2004), Wisconsin v. Knapp, No. 03-590; Knapp I reaffirmed on remand, State v. Matthew J. Knapp (II), 2005 WI 127 For Knapp: Robert G. LeBell Issue: Whether physical evidence derived from a statement taken in violation of Miranda is… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Functional Equivalent of Interrogation

State v. Ondra Bond, 2000 WI App 118, 237 Wis. 2d 633, 614 NW2d 552, affirmed by equally divided vote, 2001 WI 56, 243 Wis. 2d 476, 627 N.W.2d 484 For Bond: William Coleman; Janet Barnes; Ellen Henak, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue: Whether, following arrest but before administration of Miranda rights, an officer’s response to the suspect’s… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS