≡ Menu

A. In-Custody, 5th Amendment

State v. Esteban M. Gonzalez, 2010 WI App 104, reversed, 2011 WI 63, see: this post; for Gonzalez: Kristin Anne Hodorowski; BiC; Resp.; Reply Jury Instructions – Exposing Child to Harmful Materials The pattern instruction on exposing a child to harmful material, § 948.11(2)(a), accurately recites the elements, including scienter. ¶11 We agree with the trial… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Armando J. Castanada, No. 2009AP1438-CR, District I, 6/15/10 court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication); for Castanada: Jeremy C. Perri; BiC; Resp.; Reply Appellate Review – Implicit Findings ¶30     The postconviction circuit court did not make any express findings as to the credibility of any of the witnesses’ testimony. However, as… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Berghuis v. Thompkins, USSC No. 08-1470, 6/1/10 Thompkins’ acknowledgment that he prayed for God’s forgiveness for the shooting was admissible as valid waiver of Miranda rights, despite being preceded by nearly 3 hours of silence during custodial interrogation. Rights must be invoked unequivocally, or not at all: The Court has not yet stated whether an… Read more

{ 0 comments }

decision below: 2010 WI App 11; for Forbush: Craig Mastantuono; Rebecca M. Coffee Issues: Whether the right to counsel under the Wisconsin Constitution prohibits the state from interrogating a represented individual once the state is aware of the representation Whether a suspect made an equivocal request for counsel during police questioning, thereby invoking his right… Read more

{ 0 comments }

court of appeals decision (1-judge; not for publication); BiC; Resp. Br.; Reply Br. Miranda – Traffic Stop – Marijuana Odor and Probable Cause Suppression of passenger’s statement due to custodial interrogation without Miranda warnings leaves police without probable cause to arrest driver: ¶7        First, we will address the State’s argument that Kohel’s statement “[w]e just… Read more

{ 0 comments }

court of appeals decision (1-judge; not for publication); BiC; Resp. Br.; Reply Br. Miranda – Suppressed Statement and Probable Cause ¶7        First, we will address the State’s argument that Kohel’s statement “[w]e just smoked an hour ago” was voluntary and should not be suppressed. The trial court found, and we agree, that Kohel’s statement was the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

court of appeals decision (3-judge; not recommended for publication); BiC; Resp. Br. “Booking Exception” to Miranda Questioning to determine Pugh’s “true identity” fell within “booking exception.” Sentencing Discretion Sentence upheld where “well within maximum” and addressed “the three primary factors.”… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Maryland v. Shatzer, USSC No. 08-680

ussc decision “Edwards” Rule – 14-Day Expiry A “break in custody” ends the presumptive involuntariness of a statement following invocation of right to counsel; reinterrogation permitted after 14-day lapse. … The protections offered by Miranda, which we have deemed sufficient to ensure that the police respect the suspect’s desire to have an attorney present the… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS