State v. Jason K. Van Buren, 2008 WI App 26; for Van Buren: Waring R. Fincke Issue: Whether trial counsel’s failure to adduce expert testimony on false confessions was deficient. Holding: ¶18 Here, we do not address the prejudice prong of Strickland because we conclude that Van Buren’s counsel was not deficient. A finding of deficient performance “requires showing… Read more
D. Ineffective Assistance
State v. Dwight Glen Jones, 2007 WI App 248 For Jones: Ellen Henak, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶13 Although an indigent defendant does not have the right to pick his or her trial lawyer, Mulkovich v. State, 73 Wis. 2d 464, 474, 243 N.W.2d 198, 203–204 (1976) (“This court has frequently said that, except in cases of… Read more
State v. Jennifer Wery, 2007 WI App 169 For Wery: Elizabeth Ewald-Herrick Issue/Holding: ¶17 Wery’s counsel’s failure to object did not constitute deficient performance. Deficient performance is limited to situations where the law or duty is clear such that reasonable counsel should know enough to raise the issue. State v. McMahon, 186 Wis. 2d 68, 85… Read more
State ex rel. Clayborn L. Walker v. Frank, 2007 WI App 142, PFR filed 6/1/07 For Walker: Amelia L. Bizzaro Issue: Whether counsel deficiently advised Walker to waive ES revocation, in that counsel determined that investigation of alternatives to revocation would be futile. Holding: ¶14 Dudley’s decision to advise Walker to waive the revocation hearing… Read more
State ex rel. Luis Santana v. Endicott, 2006 WI App 13 Issue/Holding1: A claim that lapsed direct appeal rights should be restored on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel must be sought via habeas filed in the court of appeals, pursuant to State v. Knight, 168 Wis. 2d 509, 484 N.W.2d 540 (1992): ¶1 … Read more
State v. Dion W. Demmerly, 2006 WI App 181, PFR filed 9/11/06 For Demmerly: Edward J. Hunt Issue/Holding: Counsel’s cross-examination of state’s witness testifying under a grant of immunity was adequate where it revealed that the witness’s motivation for testifying was a desire to receive leniency on his pending charges, ¶22; and, also where any confusion about… Read more
State v. Roberto Vargas Rodriguez, 2006 WI App 163, PFR filed 8/28/06 For Rodriguez: Donna L. Hintze, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶39 Questions that call for a narrative are generally improper because they do not alert court and counsel to the subject about which the witness is about to testify. There are exceptions, however, and whether… Read more
State v. Juan F. Milanes, 2006 WI App 259, PFR filed 12/7/06 Milanes: Joan M. Boyd Issue/Holding: Counsel’s failure to litigate a (Miranda) suppression motion was not deficient where the issue turned purely on a credibility dispute between defendant and the detective and pursuit of the motion would have required rejecting a favorable offer, ¶¶15-16… Read more
