≡ Menu

8. Counsel, 6th Am.

State v. Joseph J. Johnson, 2011AP806-CR, District 4, 11/3/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Johnson: Rebecca J. Vahle; case activity Trial counsel’s failure to move to strike several jurors for cause didn’t require Machner hearing: ¶12      In State v. Traylor, 170 Wis. 2d 393, 399-400, 489 N.W.2d 626 (Ct. App. 1992), this court… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Habeas – Concurrent Sentence Doctrine

Matthew Steffes v. Thurmer, 7th Cir No. 09-3317, 11/4/11 seventh circuit decision, denying habeas relief on review of 2006AP1633-CR The “concurrent sentence doctrine” – which “allows appellate courts to decline to review a conviction carrying a concurrent sentence when one ‘concurrent’ conviction has been found valid,” Cheeks v. Gaetz, 571 F.3d 680, 684-85 (7th Cir.2009) – doesn’t… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. David W. Domke, 2011 WI 95, reversing unpublished decision; for Domke: Martha K. Askins, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity Although Domke establishes deficient performance in several different respects, he fails to satisfy his burden of showing prejudice. Failure to object to hearsay testimony / medical treatment and diagnosis exception inapplicable to counselors and… Read more

{ 0 comments }

In the Matter of Sanctions in: State v. Gregory K. Nielsen, 2011 WI 94, remanding sanctions order; for State Public Defender: Joseph N. Ehmann; case activity; subsequent history: sanction re-imposed on remand Monetary sanction summarily ordered by court of appeals against appellate counsel for allegedly violating appendix-content rule reversed, with following “suggestion” for procedure to be followed in… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Kathleen N. v. Brenda L. C., 2010AP2737, District 4, 10/27/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Brenda l.C.: Eileen A. Hirsch, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity Brenda isn’t entitled to a new TPR trial in the interests of justice, notwithstanding a line of inquiry that went to the respective financial capabilities of Brenda… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Edward Beck, 2010AP872-CR, District 4, 10/20/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); pro se; case activity Circuit court is under no obligation to seek extension of the § 809.30(2) limitation period for its ruling on a postconviction motion. ¶6        Beck reads too much into the 2001 amendment to Wis. Stat. § 809.30(2)(i).  The amendment simply added language… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Omark D. Ward, 2011 WI App 151 (recommended for publication); for Ward: Mary Scholle, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate; case activity Ineffective Assistance of Counsel – DNA Search Warrant  Court commissioner’s order that Ward provide DNA sample violated “oath or affirmation” requirement for warrants: ¶10      Unless a person consents to giving a sample of his or her… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

State v. Michael A. Clements, 2010AP1978-CR, District 4, 10/13/11 court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Clements: Steven D. Grunder, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity Counsel’s performance not deficient, against claims that he failed to: impeach the complainant with a prior recorded statement; object on hearsay grounds to admissibility of her statement to a school counselor… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS