Wisconsin supreme court decision; below: certification; for Wood: Kristin E. Lehker; for amicus, Disability Rights Watch: Kristin Kerschensteiner; Supp. App. Br.; Supp. Resp.; Supp. Reply Due Process Challenge to Statute ¶13 A party may challenge a law or government action as being unconstitutional on its face. Under such a challenge, the challenger must show that the law cannot… Read more
8. Counsel, 6th Am.
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication) BiC; Resp. Br.; Reply Br. Traffic Arrest Probable cause to believe Broad drove on public roadway, hence to arrest for OWI, where car was found off the road, Broad was in driver’s seat and admitted to being driver, car “was warm and running.” Right to Testify Violation of… Read more
7th Circuit decision Terry Stop / Frisk 1. Pulling up in a patrol car and telling Gentry to keep his hands up amounted to a stop for purposes of Terry analysis. 2. The stop, which was based on a report of a “suspicious person,” without reference to any specific facts concerning a crime, was not… Read more
court of appeals decision (3-judge; not recommended for publication); Resp. Br; Reply Br Exculpatory Material Defense had access to assertedly suppressed exculpatory material, hence no Brady violation. Effective Assistance Counsel had valid tactical reason for cross-examination approach; failure to file discovery demand, object to certain testimony: “The defendant must affirmatively prove prejudice. … Walker has not even attempted… Read more
court of appeals decision (3-judge; not recommended for publication) Machner Hearing Postconviction motion conclusory, didn’t require Machner hearing on effective assistance. Recusal Judicial comments reflecting attempt to get Jackson to tell truth in connection with asserted problems with lawyer didn’t establish judicial bias. Sentencing Sentence taking into account primary factors and much less than maximum… Read more
court of appeals decision; for Marinez: David Leeper; BiC; Resp. Br.; Reply Br. Appellate Procedure – Waiver and Effective Assistance of Counsel ¶12 n. 12: Although Marinez argues ineffective assistance of counsel, he also asks that we review his statutory and due process arguments directly. He cites to State v. Anderson, 2006 WI 77, ¶26, 291 Wis. 2d… Read more
court of appeals decision; for Carter: Melinda A. Swartz, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate; Resp. Br.; Reply Br. Ex Parte Judicial Questioning, Pretrial Proceeding Pretrial judicial questioning of a witness at return of a bench warrant worked deprivation of the defendant’s rights to counsel and presence at trial when the witness was subsequently impeached with statements she… Read more
S.C. Johnson v. Milton E. Morris, 2010 WI App 6, PFR filed 12/30/09 Issue/Holding: ¶5 n. 1: We note that neither Russell’s nor Buske’s appellate counsel properly cite to the record. Record cites are often missing. An appellate court is improperly burdened where briefs fail to consistently and accurately cite to the record. Meyer v… Read more
