≡ Menu

Published 2001

City of Milwaukee v. Tanya M. Bean, et al., 2001 WI App 258, PFR filed 11/8/01 For Bean: Jerome F. Buting, Pamela S. Moorshead Issue1: Whether prostitution activities in the area encompassed by the injunction were shown sufficiently to constitute a nuisance. Holding: ¶13. Although it is true, as the appellants argue, that the infusion of… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Joseph E.G., 2001 WI App 29, 240 Wis. 2d 481, 623 N.W.2d 137 For Joseph E.G.: Susan E. Alesia, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether § 301.45(1m) (1997-98) violates equal protection and substantive due process in failing to excuse juveniles convicted of false imprisonment from sex offender registration. Holding: ¶12 In contrast to the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Matthew J. Trecroci, Ryan J. Frayer, Ronnie J. Frayer, Scott E. Oberst, Amy L. Wicks, 2001 WI App 126 For defendants: Robert R. Henak Issue: Whether warrantless police entry of a stairway in a multiple unit building was lawful. Holding: Existence of reasonable expectation of privacy in a stairway leading to the upper levels of… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Robert F. Hart, 2001 WI App 283 For Hart: John Deitrich Issue: Whether the need to transport in a police vehicle a person, who is not in custody, is itself an exigency justifying a pat-down search for weapons. Holding: ¶17. … With five members of the court declining to adopt a per ser rule… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Eddie McAttee, 2001 WI App 262 For McAttee: Russell D. Bohach Issue: Whether the Riverside probable cause finding was tainted by a factual misrepresentation (specifically, that McAttee had been implicated by a “coconspirator”) in the police report submitted in support of continued detention. Holding: Though describing the informant as a coconspirator “may have been legally… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Ashley B. Steele, 2001 WI App 160, PFR filed 6/25/01 For Steele: Christopher William Rose Issue: Whether sentencing eligibility for “boot camp” is determined by bright-line statutory guidelines, or by exercise of trial court discretion. Holding: ¶12. While an offender must meet the eligibility requirements of Wis. Stat. § 302.045(2) to participate in the challenge… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Bill Paul Marquardt, 2001 WI App 219, PFR filed 9/20/01 For Marquardt: James B. Connell Issue: Whether evidence seized under a warrant defective because unsupported by probable cause may be admissible under the good-faith doctrine. Holding: Given that, subsequent to trial-level litigation, the supreme court recognized the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule, in State v… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Warrants – Probable Cause

State v. Bill Paul Marquardt, 2001 WI App 219, PFR filed 9/20/01 For Marquardt: James B. Connell Issue: Whether the search warrant was supported by probable cause. Holding: ¶18. …. The State points to several facts in the affidavits: (1) Mary’s telephone was off the hook the day she was killed, suggesting “that the perpetrator had… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS