≡ Menu

Published 2001

State v. David L. Munroe, 2001 WI App 104 For Munroe: Peter Koneazny, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue: Whether Munroe’s acquiescence, under false pretenses, to police entry of his motel room vitiated any consent for their subsequent search of that room, where Munroe refused their initial request to search. Holding: ¶11 The officers entered Munroe’s room for… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Matthew J. Trecroci, Ryan J. Frayer, Ronnie J. Frayer, Scott E. Oberst, Amy L. Wicks, 2001 WI App 126 For defendants: Robert R. Henak Issue: Whether an apartment owner’s consent to search his apartment, given in response to police threat to obtain a search warrant even though no probable cause existed, was involuntary. Holding… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Bill Paul Marquardt , 2001 WI App 219, PFR filed 9/20/01 For Marquardt: James B. Connell Issue: Whether the automobile exception allowed the warrantless search of defendant’s car. Holding: A warrantless search of a vehicle requires two showings: probable cause; and “ready” mobility of vehicle. ¶¶31-32. Because the defendant did not contest probable cause until his… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Exigency — Blood Alcohol

State v. Paul J. VanLaarhoven, 2001 WI App 275 For VanLaarhoven: Michele Anne Tjader Issue: Whether a blood sample, properly obtained under the Implied Consent law, may be analyzed without a warrant. Holding: The Implied Consent law requires that all who apply for a driver’s license consent not only to provide a sample, but also a chemical… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Albert Jackowski, 2001 WI App 187 For Jackowski: Ronald C. Shiroka Issue: Whether violation of a statutory requirement for issuance of a building inspection warrant (namely, the § 66.0119(2) condition that such a warrant be issued only upon showing that consent to enter was refused) supports suppression of evidence obtained after entry under the warrant. Holding… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Albert Jackowski, 2001 WI App 187 For Jackowski: Ronald C. Shiroka Issue1: Whether review of issuance of an administrative warrant is entitled to the same deference as a criminal search warrant. Holding: “Great deference” is no less accorded a magistrate’s decision to issue an administrative warrant than a criminal search warrant. ¶¶9-14. Issue2: Whether a building… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Stanley A. Samuel, 2001 WI App 25, 240 Wis. 2d 756, reversed, other grounds, 2002 WI 34 For Samuel: Robert R. Henak Issue: Whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain conviction for interference with child custody, § 948.31(2) and abduction, § 948.30(1)(a). Holding: ¶38      We adopt the State’s construction.  So long as the defendant has had a hand… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Davon R. Malcom, 2001 WI App 291, PFR filed 11/27/01 For Malcom: John D. Lubarsky, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether the trial court properly amended the information, after close of evidence, to add a charge of keeping a place “which is resorted to by persons using controlled substances” to the charge of using the… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS