≡ Menu

Published 2003

State v. Robert Jamont Wright, 2003 WI App 252 For Wright: Ann Auberry Issue/Holding: ¶44. Alternatively, Wright argues that Lomack’s testimony was admissible as other acts evidence of a third-party perpetrator pursuant to Scheidell. Scheidell involved the admissibility of other acts evidence committed by an unknown third party, which was proffered by the accused on the issue of… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Richard G.B., 2003 WI App 13, PFR filed 1/13/03 For Richard G.B.: Bridget E. Boyle Issue: Whether the “third-party exception” to spousal privilege — which overrides the privilege for crimes committed “against” the spouse, § 905.05(3) — is triggered by sexual assault of a non-spouse, on the theory that such an act amounts to adultery, § 944.16(1)… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Privilege – § 905.13, Comment on Silence

State v. John S. Cooper, 2003 WI App 227, PFR filed 11/14/03 For Cooper: John A. Birdsall Issue/Holding: ¶19. The test for determining if there has been an impermissible comment on a defendant’s right to remain silent is whether the language used was manifestly intended or was of such character that the jury would naturally… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Joshua L. Howland, 2003 WI App 104 For Howland: Paul G. LaZotte, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶37. We conclude that the district attorney’s contacts with the Department of Probation and Parole, complaining about the PSI author’s sentence recommendation, when the plea agreement required the State to make no sentence recommendation, resulted in a… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. John A. Jipson, 2003 WI App 222 For Jipson: Martha K. Askins, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: On a charge of 2nd-degree sexual assault, § 948.02(2), the guilty plea court must ascertain the defendant’s knowledge of the element of intent, namely that the defendant had sexual contact for the purpose of sexual degradation, humiliation, arousal… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Richard A. Lange, 2003 WI App 2 For Lange: Daniel F. Snyder Issue/Holding: Where the plea form made reference to an “attached sheet” which was not in fact attached, and the trial court did not go over the elements with the defendant, “the record is barren as to any explanation or detailing to Lange… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Guilty Pleas – Required Knowledge — Rights

State v. Richard A. Lange, 2003 WI App 2 For Lange: Daniel F. Snyder Issue/Holding: Trial court’s colloquy sufficiently established defendant’s understanding of rights waived by guilty plea. ¶¶23-27… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Leonard C. Matson, 2003 WI App 253 For Matson: Michael Yovovich, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶13. Matson argues his due process rights were violated when Alstadt, the investigating detective in this case, gave a sentencing recommendation that undermined the State’s recommendation, in effect, breaching the plea agreement. The State counters that Alstadt was… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS