≡ Menu

Published 2003

State v. Joshua L. Howland, 2003 WI App 104 For Howland: Paul G. LaZotte, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶32. We must also note that the inappropriate nature of the contact between the district attorney’s office and the Division of Community Corrections borders on ex parte communications. Our supreme court has acknowledged the importance of the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Randy D. Stafford, 2003 WI App 138 For Stafford: Robert G. LeBell Issue/Holding: A mental health professional whose assessment of the sexual assault defendant was incorporated into the presentence report and cited at length by the sentencing judge and who had, unbeknownst to the defense, treated the victim for the six months prior to… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Fond du Lac County v. Elizabeth M.P., 2003 WI App 232 For Elizabeth M.P.: Thomas K. Voss Issue: Whether the circuit court had jurisdiction to transfer Elizabeth, who was on outpatient status under ch. 51, to inpatient status given that judicial review of the county’s transfer decision wasn’t held within 10 days, contrary to § 51.35(1)(e)3. Holding… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Guardianship: Protective Placement

Walworth County v. Therese B., 2003 WI App 223 Issue/Holding: Procedural due process in guardianship and protective placement proceedings is governed by the analysis used in mental commitments, W.J.C. v. Vilas County, 124 Wis. 2d 238, 240, 369 N.W.2d 162 (Ct. App. 1985), which in turn adopts Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976): ¶11 … The Mathews test “involves… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Randy D. Stafford, 2003 WI App 138 For Stafford: Robert G. LeBell Issue/Holding: A mental health professional whose assessment of the sexual assault defendant was incorporated into the presentence report and cited at length by the sentencing judge and who had, unbeknownst to the defense, treated the victim for the six months prior to… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Sentence Modification — New Factor — Health

State v. Peter C. Ramuta, 2003 WI App 80, PFR filed 4/3/03 For Ramuta: Peter M. Koneazny, Richard D. Martin, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶21. Further, Ramuta’s obesity-related health problems and his resulting shorter-than-normal life expectancy are also not new factors. See Michels, 150 Wis. 2d at 99-100, 441 N.W.2d at 280-281 (defendant’s health and its… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Peter C. Ramuta, 2003 WI App 80, PFR filed 4/3/03 For Ramuta: Peter M. Koneazny, Richard D. Martin, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue/Holding: Subsequent sentences on charges pending at the time of this sentencing didn’t amount to a new factor, State v. Norton, 2001 WI App 245, distinguished: ¶20. Ramuta has not demonstrated by clear and… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Modification — New Factor — General Test

State v. Peter C. Ramuta, 2003 WI App 80, PFR filed 4/3/03 For Ramuta: Peter M. Koneazny, Richard D. Martin, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶8. The law appropriately recognizes that sentences may be based on what is unknowingly incomplete information, and, if they are, that there should be some mechanism to correct a resulting injustice… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS