≡ Menu

Published 2003

State v. Shawn Virlee, 2003 WI App 4, PFR filed 1/3/03 For Virlee: Jack E. Schairer Issue/Holding: Barring introduction of the post-petition grant of sentence credit was proper: this evidence “would have been irrelevant to whether the State filed its petition within ninety days of Virlee’s release and would have confused the jury on this… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jonathan R. Torres, 2003 WI App 199, PFR filed 9/18/03 For Torres: Michael Yovovich, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether reclassification of Torres’ offense by TIS-II, 2001 Wis. Act 109 §§545-559, which substantially reduced the maximum penalty, amounts to a new factor that would support reduction of his sentence imposed under the prior, TIS-I regime. Holding… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Shawn Virlee, 2003 WI App 4, PFR filed 1/3/03 For Virlee: Jack E. Schairer Issue: Whether post-petition grant of jail credit deprived the court of competency to proceed, where the petition was filed within 90 days of the pre-grant release date, but would be untimely when calculated against the post-grant date. Holding: ¶17… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Henry Pocan, 2003 WI App 233 For Pocan: Margaret A. Maroney, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: Pocan established probable cause for a discharge hearing where the psychologist conducting the reevaluation and using actuarial tables unavailable at the time of original commitment found no substantial probability of reoffending: ¶11. The State argues that Wis. Stat… Read more

{ 0 comments }

SVP – Pretrial Release

State v. Shawn Virlee, 2003 WI App 4, PFR filed 1/3/03 For Virlee: Jack E. Schairer Issue: Whether ch. 980 violates due process and/or equal protection because it doesn’t allow for pretrial release. Holding: ¶14. We decline to address Virlee’s due process and equal protection arguments because he fails to establish, and we do not see, how… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Randy D. Stafford, 2003 WI App 138 For Stafford: Robert G. LeBell Issue/Holding: ¶12. … To obtain sentence modification, a defendant must establish that (1) a new factor exists, and (2) the new factor justifies sentence modification. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989). Whether a fact or set… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Ray A. Schiller, 2003 WI App 195 For Schiller: Jack E. Schairer, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶11. However, a “serious difficulty in controlling behavior” is not about whether a person has the ability to make choices….¶12. The Crane Court further indicated that we must not only consider whether the person has the ability… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Richard G.B., 2003 WI App 13, PFR filed 1/13/03 For Richard G.B.: Bridget E. Boyle Issue/Holding: Sentence of 18 years for sexual assault of a child (mouth-vagina intercourse with 15 year-old niece) wasn’t harsh and excessive, measured against a maximum possible sentence of 20 years. Trial court also “articulated its reasoning for the sentence… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS