≡ Menu

Published 2005

Plea-Withdrawal – Pre-Sentence – Generally

State v. Jarmal Nelson, 2005 WI App 113 For Nelson: Wm. J. Tyroler, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶11      “A defendant seeking to withdraw a plea of guilty or no contest prior to sentencing must show that there is a ‘fair and just reason,’ for allowing him or her to withdraw the plea.” State v. Kivioja… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jeremy K. Morse, 2005 WI App 223 For Morse: Amelia L. Bizarro Issue/Holding: ¶10      Here, the record reflects that Morse failed to demonstrate either a statutory or a Bangert violation. The plea hearing addressed all the appropriate issues and contains no statutory violations. The plea was extensive and complete. The fact that Morse… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jarmal Nelson, 2005 WI App 113 For Nelson: Wm. J. Tyroler, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue/Holding: Given that the record established Nelson’s ignorance of the potential for commitment as a sexually violent person (ch. 980) as a result of his guilty pleas, the trial court’s conclusion that he presented a “fair and just” reason… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jarmal Nelson, 2005 WI App 113 For Nelson: Wm. J. Tyroler, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue: Whether, after Nelson demonstrated a “fair and just” reason for pre-sentencing plea withdrawal, the State satisfied is concomitant burden of showing “substantial prejudice” in order to defeat the motion, where the principal complainant could no longer be found… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Xavier J. Rockette, 2005 WI App 205 For Rockette: Timothy A. Provis Issue/Holding: Issue/Holding: Trial court’s error in refusing to order suppression of statement was harmless under § 971.31(10), under following circumstances: ¶27      We conclude that the result in this case would have been the same beyond a reasonable doubt even if the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jeremy K. Morse, 2005 WI App 223 For Morse: Amelia L. Bizarro Issue: Whether Morse was entitled to plea-withdrawal on the basis of claimed newly discovered evidence, in the form of taped jail conversations between inmates discussing his case, and certain police reports. Holding: The trial court’s findings that the tapes were inadmissible… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Monika S. Lackershire, 2005 WI App 265, reversed, 2007 WI 74 For Lackershire: Steven P. Weiss, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether Lackershire, an adult female convicted of sexual assault (intercourse) of a child, established a prima facie case for plea-withdrawal due to lack of adequate understanding of the elements. Holding: ¶8        Initially, we note that in… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Compulsory School Attendance, § 118.15(5)(b)2

State v. Gwendolyn McGee, 2005 WI App 97 For McGee: Amelia L. Bizarro Issue/Holding: The disobedient-child defense to a compulsory-attendance charge is an affirmative defense issue to be presented to the fact-finder at trial for resolution (as opposed to disposition by pretrial motion)… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS