≡ Menu

Published 2006

Due Process – Presumptions, Generally

State v. Eric Benjamin Gardner, 2006 WI App 92 For Gardner: Michael K. Gould, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶9        In addressing this issue, it is first necessary to define what a presumption is and when a presumption denies a criminal defendant due process. A presumption allows a “trier of fact to determine the existence of… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Gerald L. Lynch, Jr., 2006 WI App 231, PFR filed 11/6/06 For Lynch: David R. Karpe Issue: Whether a higher level of scrutiny applies to an equal protection challenge to a prison early release program which categorically withholds eligibility from certain types of crimes. Holding: ¶13      The State, on the other hand, argues that we should… Read more

{ 1 comment }

State v. Gerald L. Lynch, Jr., 2006 WI App 231, PFR filed 11/6/06 For Lynch: David R. Karpe Issue:  Whether statutory ineligibility for Earned Release, § 973.01(3g), for homicide by intoxicated use violates equal protection given eligibility for driving while intoxicated but not causing death or great bodily harm. Holding: ¶18      Applying this standard, we conclude there is… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Joseph J. Hammill, 2006 WI App 128. For Hammill: Patrick J. Stangl Issue/Holding: ¶15      Hammill argues the circuit court erred by counting a Village of Cameron conviction. Hammill was arrested in that case for OWI-first on January 1, 1991. On January 28, Hammill was arrested for OWI in Eau Claire, which was also charged as a… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Joseph J. Hammill, 2006 WI App 128 For Hammill: Patrick J. Stangl Issue/Holding: ¶6        A defendant may collaterally attack a prior conviction in an enhanced sentence proceeding only on the ground that the defendant was denied the constitutional right to counsel. … ¶7        Hammill argues that he made a prima facie showing that he… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Kevin J. Helsper, 2006 WI App 243 For Helsper: Glenn L. Cushing, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶7        Constitutional limits on a state’s recoupment of attorney fees are grounded in both due process and equal protection principles. Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 665 (1983). Recoupment statutes must be tailored to “impose an obligation only upon… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jonathan Owens, 2006 WI App 75, PFR filed 4/4/06 For Owens: Dianne M. Erickson Issue: Whether the sentencing court’s initial denial of ERP eligibility, seemingly on the improper basis of the defendant’s age, was a proper exercise of discretion where on motion for reconsideration the court “stated that it had intended to refer to Owens’s… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Gerald L. Lynch, Jr., 2006 WI App 231, PFR filed 11/6/06 For Lynch: David R. Karpe Issue: Whether statutory ineligibility for Earned Release, § 973.01(3g), for homicide by intoxicated use violates equal protection given eligibility for driving while intoxicated but not causing death or great bodily harm. Holding: ¶18      Applying this standard, we conclude there is… Read more

{ 1 comment }
RSS