≡ Menu

Published 2007

State v. Steven L. Pfeil, 2007 WI App 241 For Pfeil: John P. Tedesco, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: Time spent in custody of the (now-lapsed) division of intensive sanctions tolls the limitation period for prior convictions, § 939.62(2): ¶2        …. We conclude that supervision under the intensive sanctions program constitutes “actual confinement” within the meaning of… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Ryan W. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, PFR filed 9/27/07 For Drew: Steven Zaleski Issue/Holding: Analysis of admissibility of photo array ID remains unchanged by the new standard for show-ups set by State v. Tyrone L. Dubose, 2005 WI 126: ¶2 We conclude that Dubose did not alter the standard for determining whether admission of an… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Scott R. Jensen, 2007 WI App 256; prior history: State v. Scott R. Jensen, 2004 WI App 89,affirmed, 2005 WI 31 For Jensen: Robert H. Friebert, Matthew W. O’Neill Issue/Holding: ¶36      We agree with the State that the testimony of Jensen’s defense witnesses as to the practices of both Democrats and Republicans in the legislature of using… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Warrants – “Franks” Hearing

State v. Christopher D. Sloan, 2007 WI App 146 For Sloan: Thomas E. Hayes Issue/Holding: Immaterial differences of memory don’t establish the “deliberate falsity or reckless disregard” for truth required to trigger a Franks hearing, ¶¶17-21; nor is such a hearing mandated in the absence of specific request, ¶22.  … Read more

{ 0 comments }

Warrants – Good Faith

State v. Christopher D. Sloan, 2007 WI App 146 Issue/Holding: ¶26 The trial court here did not find a nexus in the affidavit between the items sought and the house to be searched. Nonetheless, the trial court concluded, in deference to the judge who signed the warrant, that “[t]here’s the good faith exception here. If… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Quantae T. Hines, 2007 WI App 39 For Hines: Richard D. Martin, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue/Holding: A defendant has a right to allocute during a reconfinement proceeding, the remedy for violation of which is resentencing, ¶¶18-20. The outcome is largely controlled by State v. John C. Brown, 2006 WI 131, which held that reconfinement is… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Kathy J. Johnson, 2007 WI App 41 For Johnson: Jeremy Perri, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue: Whether DOC policy, for inmates under sentence commencing prior to July 26, 2003, to take no position on an ERP petition constitutes approval of the petition under Wis. Stat. § 302.05(3)(e). Holding: ¶8        Wisconsin Stat. § 302.05(3)(e) governs inmate petitions… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Thomas William Brady, 2007 WI App 33, PFR filed 2/13/07 For Brady: Suzanne L. Hagopian, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: Where the target of a search was not at home when the police forcibly entered pursuant to a search warrant, their unannounced entry did not, although not authorized by the warrant, violate the fourth amendment. ¶13… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS