State v. Michael G. Mertes, 2008 WI App 179, PFR filed 12/17/08 For Mertes: Andrea Taylor Cornwall, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue: Whether finding the sleeping occupant of a vehicle parked at a gas station, with engine off but key in the ignition, along with other factors sufficiently proved the OWI element of “operating.” Holding: ¶13 Wisconsin Stat. § 346.63(3)(b)… Read more
Published 2008
State v. Thomas P. Tecza, 2008 WI App 79, PFR filed 5/22/08 For Tecza: Timothy P. Swatek Issue: Whether a roadway within a gated community entry to which is guarded by a security station is “held out to the public for use of their motor vehicles” so as to support drunk driving conviction within § 346.61. Holding… Read more
State v. Shane P. Kashney, 2008 WI App 164 For Kashney: Paul G. LaZotte, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: While State v. Patrick A. Saunders, 2002 WI 107 limits proof of a repeater enhancement to the “post-trial” setting, that limitation is satisfied if the State submits the proof after verdict (and before the court has pronounced judgment). ¶1… Read more
State v. Jonathan W. Nawrocki, 2008 WI App 23 For Nawrocki: Scott D. Obernberger Issue/Holding: ¶2 The issue presented in this case is whether a showup identification is necessary, thus meeting the first test of admissibility under Dubose, when probable cause exists to justify an arrest of a suspect, but it does not exist on the… Read more
State v. Jonathan W. Nawrocki, 2008 WI App 23 For Nawrocki: Scott D. Obernberger Issue/Holding: ¶29 Having concluded that the showup identifications of Nawrocki were not necessary and therefore should have been suppressed, we next must address whether Albert’s and/or Gerhardt’s in-court identifications of Nawrocki were based on an independent source that was untainted by… Read more
State v. Kevin M. Champlain, 2008 WI App 5, (AG’s) PFR filed 1/4/08 For Champlain: Martha K. Askins, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: Once it became aware that the jail administrator was requiring that the defendant wear an armband taser device during the jury trial, the court, “the trial court had an affirmative, sua sponte duty to inquire… Read more
State v. Ray Shawn Cherry, 2008 WI App 80 For Cherry: John T. Wasielewski Issue/Holding: ¶5 The statutes governing this issue are clear. If a trial court sentences a defendant to a felony involving a sex crime contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.225, 948.02(1) or (2) 948.025, or 948.085, the trial court must order the defendant to pay… Read more
State v. Ray Shawn Cherry, 2008 WI App 80 For Cherry: John T. Wasielewski Issue: Whether the sentencing court properly exercised discretion in imposing a DNA surcharge, where it misconstrued such action as mandatory rather than permissive and ignored the defendant’s prior such assessment. Holding: ¶9 We hold that in assessing whether to impose the DNA… Read more
