≡ Menu

17. Sec. 940.20

State v. Dione Wendell Haywood, 2009 WI App 178 For Haywood: Robert E. Haney Issue/Holding: In a battery-to-officer prosecution, it is no defense that the officer refused to leave the premises when the resident withdrew consent to enter, because acting “lawfully” is not an element: ¶11      The flaw in Haywood’s contention, however, is that a law-enforcement… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Leslie M. Haynes, 2001 WI App 266, PFR filed 11/2/01 For Haynes: Gerald F. Kuchler Issue: Whether “the arresting officer from Waukesha county was not acting in his official capacity or with lawful authority as a police officer when he asked [Haynes] to perform field sobriety tests, arrested her and transported her to a… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. James T. Fitzgerald, 2000 WI App 55, 233 Wis. 2d 584, 608 N.W.2d 391 For Fitzgerald: Daniel P. Dunn Issue: Whether a probationer in custody under a probation hold is necessarily a “prisoner” within the battery by prisoner statute, Wis. Stat. § 940.20(1). Holding: Because a “prisoner” is someone confined as a result of a… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Damone J. Block, 222 Wis. 2d 586, 587 N.W.2d 914 (Ct. App. 1998) For Block: James M. Weber Issue/Holding: Block’s next claim is that there was insufficient evidence to prove all of the elements of assault by a prisoner. Those elements are: (1) the defendant was a prisoner at the time of the… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS