≡ Menu

H. Ch. 946: Against gov’t/admin

State v. Rick L. Edwards, 2003 WI App 221, PFR filed 10/24/03 For Edwards: Margaret A. Maroney, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: A probationer whose order of jail confinement has been stayed during a period of hospitalization is not in custody for § 946.42 purposes and therefore may not be charged with escape for leaving the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Bernell Ross, 2003 WI App 27, PFR filed 2/21/03 For Ross: Andrew Mishlove Issue/Holding: Evidence of investor losses is relevant to a charge of racketeering, § 946.83. ¶37… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Kelley L. Hauk, 2002 WI App 226 For Hauk: David D. Cook Issue/Holding: State need not charge defendant with both bail jumping and underlying crime in order to obtain conviction for bail jumping (i.e., violating bond by committing crime). ¶¶14-18. ¶19 We therefore conclude that as long as there is evidence sufficient to allow a… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Joseph M. Espinoza, 2002 WI App 51, subsequently overruled by State v. Brent R. Reed, 2005 WI 53 For Espinoza: Steven P. Weiss, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether a suspect’s mere denial of guilt of the crime under investigation may in and of itself establish probable cause for the separate crime of obstructing, § 946.41(1)… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Paul Venema, 2002 WI App 202 For Venema: Randall R. Garczynski Issue/Holding: ¶20 We reject Venema’s argument that a contract has to be in existence in order for a violation to occur under Wis. Stat. § 946.13(1)(a). Such an interpretation is undermined by the plain meaning of the statutory language. The common meaning of… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Escape, § 946.42 — “Actual Custody”

State v. Deborah J. Zimmerman, 2001 WI App 238 For Zimmerman: Charles B. Vetzner, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether someone in the custody of a probation or parole agent “is in actual custody” for purposes of the escape statute, § 946.42. Holding: ¶5. To be guilty of escape, Zimmerman must be found to be in custody… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Debra Noble, 2001 WI App 145, reversed, other grounds, State v. Debra Noble, 2002 WI 64 For Noble: Jeff P. Brinckman Issue: Whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain a perjury conviction. Holding: Proof of the elements of perjury — “(1) An oral statement while under oath; (2) The statement was false when made; (3) The defendant… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Leslie M. Haynes, 2001 WI App 266, PFR filed 11/2/01 For Haynes: Gerald F. Kuchler Issue: Whether “the arresting officer from Waukesha county was not acting in his official capacity or with lawful authority as a police officer when he asked [Haynes] to perform field sobriety tests, arrested her and transported her to a… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS