≡ Menu

B. Chs. 343-346: Traffic offense

OWI – Implied Consent Law

State v. Luke T. Nirmaier, 2011AP1355-CR, District 3, 12/28/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Nirmaier: Michael M. Rajek; case activity The odor of alcohol on Nirmaier following a traffic accident resulting in substantial bodily injury triggered the implied consent law, notwithstanding absence of probable cause to arrest at that point: ¶9        Wisconsin Stat. § 343.305(3)… Read more

{ 0 comments }

OWI Enhancer – Collateral Attack

State v. Jason L. Decorah, 2011AP662-CR, District 4, 12/8/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Decorah: Corey C. Chirafisi; case activity Collateral attack on a prior OWI used as a current enhancer, on the ground Decorah didn’t understand the range of penalties therefore didn’t validly waive counsel. Decorah prevailed below, and the court… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Michael Perzel, III, 2011AP1190-CR, District 4, 12/1/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Perzel: Waring R. Fincke; case activity Blood test results are admissible without expert testimony to reflect a person’s bac at the time in question (in this OWI-related prosecution, at the time Perzel was driving), so long as… Read more

{ 1 comment }

City of Waukesha v. James F. Murphy, 2010AP2499, District 1/2, 11/29/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Murphy: Leonard G. Adent; case activity The City obtained dismissal of a then-pending OWI-1st, after discovering that Murphy had an OWI-related conviction. (Per Walworth Cnty. v. Rohner, 108 Wis. 2d 713, 722, 324 N.W.2d 682… Read more

{ 0 comments }

OWI-Repeater – Challenge to Prior Conviction

State v. Jeffrey Steinhorst, 2011AP1360-CR, District 4, 11/23/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Steinhorst: Steven Cohen; case activity Steinhorst made a prima facie showing that he did not validly waive counsel in a prior OWI case; therefore, he is entitled to a hearing at which the State must prove proper waiver… Read more

{ 0 comments }

City of Mequon v. Michael R. Wilt, 2011AP931, District 2, 11/9/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Wilt: Walter Arthur Piel, Jr.; case activity Because the trial court in this bench trial did not rely on the breath test result in finding Wilt guilty of OWI, therefore his argument that the PBT result was… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Courtney C. Beamon, 2011 WI App 131 (recommended for publication); for Beamon: Donna L. Hintze, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity; petition for review granted, 4/25/12 Fleeing, § 346.04(3) – Elements  ¶4        ….  In State v. Sterzinger, 2002 WI App 171, ¶9, 256 Wis. 2d 925, 649 N.W.2d 677, this court separated the language… Read more

{ 0 comments }

County of Ozaukee v. David W. Berend, 2011AP291, District 2, 8/24/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Berend: Walter Arthur Piel, Jr.; case activity Breathalyzer test results are admissible (and presumptively accurate) in OWI and PAC proceedings if “the sample was taken within 3 hours after the event to be proved,” § 885.235(1g). Berend’s… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS