≡ Menu

E. Privilege, Ch. 905

Attorney-client Communications – Work Product

In re Petition for Subpoena of Documents: Ramiro Estrada v. State, 228 Wis.2d 459, 596 N.W.2d 496 (Ct. App. 1999) For Estrada: Keith A. Steckbauer Holding: An alleged sexual assault perpetrator’s wife videotaped an interview with the complainant, after an attorney told them it would be helpful to know more about the allegations. The court of… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Peter Ballos, 230 Wis.2d 495, 602 N.W.2d 117 (Ct. App. 1999) For Ballos: Robert N. Myeroff. Issue: Whether the trial court should have ordered production of the state’s witness’s mental health records, for in camera inspection, upon showing that the witness had been hospitalized for depression and was obsessed with bomb-building, and where the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege, § 905.04

State v. Curtis M. Agacki, 226 Wis.2d 349, 595 N.W.2d 31 (Ct. App. 1999) For Agacki: John M. Carroll. Issue/Holding: Psychotherapist-patient may be abrogated by “dangerous-patient exception” recognized by Schuster v. Altenberg, 144 Wis.2d 223, 424 N.W.2d 159 (1988), and Tarasoff v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 551 P.2d 334 (Cal. 1976)… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Robert J. Nichelson, 220 Wis. 2d 214, 582 N.W.2d 460 (Ct. App. 1998) For Nichelson: Paul M. Moldenhauer Issue/Holding: fn. 8: The State’s right to question a defendant’s attorney when the defendant alleges that the attorney failed to properly inform him or her before entering a plea is established in State v. Van… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Munoz, 200 Wis. 2d 391, 395, 546 N.W.2d 570 (Ct. App. 1996) For Munoz: Craig M. Kuhary Issue/Holding: Here, as in Lederer, the defense offered nothing more than “the mere possibility” that the records “might produce some evidence helpful to the defense.” Lederer, however, was decided before Shiffra. The broad language of Shiffra-“that the sought-after evidence is relevant and may… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS