≡ Menu

A. Plea agreements

State v. Anthony L. Dawson, 2004 WI App 173 For Dawson: William E. Schmaal, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶25. In sum, the State has not presented us with a valid rationale for upholding the denial of Dawson’s plea withdrawal motion. Dawson has established that his plea was not knowing and voluntary because it was induced… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Anthony L. Dawson, 2004 WI App 173 For Dawson: William E. Schmaal, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether a plea bargain under which the State agrees to subsequently reopen the case and amend it to a lesser charge is legally unenforceable and, thus, renders the plea unknowing and involuntary. Holding: A reopen-and-amend provision in… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Rex E. Wollenberg, 2004 WI App 20, PFR filed 1/8/04 For Wollenberg: Susan E. Alesia, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶14. Wollenberg cites State v. Jankowski, 173 Wis. 2d 522, 528, 496 N.W.2d 215 (Ct. App. 1992), to support his claim that he cannot be convicted on the basis of a legal nullity. Jankowski… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Rex E. Wollenberg, 2004 WI App 20, PFR filed 1/8/04 For Wollenberg: Susan E. Alesia, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether Wollenberg is entitled to withdraw his plea because the procedure for a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA), § 971.39, wasn’t followed. Holding: ¶6. Wollenberg presents no evidence, other than his own arguments, that there… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Victor Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, affirming 2002 WI App 272, 258 Wis. 2d 746, 654 N.W.2d 479 For Naydihor: Philip J. Brehm Issue: Whether the State’s allocution amounted to an end-run violation of its obligation to recommend probation at sentencing by stressing Naydihor’s “lengthy history of polysubstance abuse,” his presentation of danger to… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Brian W. Sprang, 2004 WI App 121 For Sprang: Jefren E. Olsen, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether the prosecutor breached the plea agreement, which called for recommendation of probation but left a free hand to argue terms and conditions, by expressly referring to the possibility of treatment in a prison setting and by… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jesse Liukonen, 2004 WI App 157 For Liukonen: Russell L. Hanson Issue:Whether the State breached the plea agreement to cap its sentencing recommendation at a total of 17 years’ incarceration, by asserting: “the more I looked at this case, the more I heard from the victims, the more I argue today, I realize… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Rudolph L. Jackson, 2004 WI App 132, PFR filed 6/15/04 For Jackson: Andrea Cornwall, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue: Whether the prosecutor violated an agreement not to make a specific sentencing recommendation by expressing outrage at recommendations proffered on Jackson’s behalf and by urging the court to take into account the deterrent effect of… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS