≡ Menu

B. Procedure and colloquy

State v. David G. Straszkowski, 2008 WI 65, affirming summary order For Straszkowski Philip J. Brehm Issue: Whether, for a guilty plea to be “knowing and intelligent,” the defendant must be aware that a read-in is deemed an admission for sentencing purposes. Holding: ¶3   We conclude that the record clearly demonstrates that neither the State… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. David G. Straszkowski, 2008 WI 65, affirming summary order For Straszkowski Philip J. Brehm Issue: Whether a guilty plea colloquy must include an explicit warning that the defendant’s agreement to read in a dismissed charge will be deemed an admission of that charge for sentencing purposes. Holding: ¶5   Although the case law on… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Wright v. Joseph L. Van Patten,552 US 120 (2008) Prior history: Joseph Van Patten v. Deppisch, 434 F.3d 1038 (7th Cir. 2006), reinstated, 489 F. 3d 827, 2007, on remand from the Supreme Court for further consideration in light of Carey v. Musladin, 549 U. S. ___ (2006); on habeas review of, unpublished opinion of… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Eric T. Olson, 2008 WI App 171 For Olson: Byron C. Lichstein Issue/Holding: The “act other than element” of § 948.075(3) isn’t satisfied by either transmission of live video of the shirtless defendant, or by his prior sexual encounters with others he met on-line: ¶11      Accordingly, we read the statute to require that… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Lawrence Payette, 2008 WI App 106, PFR filed 6/30/08 For Payette: Robert R. Henak; Amelia L. Bizzaro Issue: Whether repeated “dope dating” (giving a minor cocaine on multiple occasions in exchange for sex) amounts to causing the child to practice prostitution within the meaning of § 948.08. Holding1: “Practice” prostitution: ¶15      Payette is… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Christopher S. Hoppe, 2008 WI App 89 For Hoppe: Martha K. Askins, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether a plea colloquy that merely established that the defendant was “satisfied” he understood “everything in the questionnaire and waiver of rights and the elements of the charges” sufficed under State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.  2d 246, 389 N.W.2d 12… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Lawrence Payette, 2008 WI App 106, PFR filed 6/30/08 For Payette: Robert R. Henak; Amelia L. Bizzaro Issue/Holding: ¶26 As our supreme court explained in White, “[i]n applying the manifest injustice test on review, this court may consider the whole record since the issue is no longer whether the guilty plea should have been… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Eric T. Olson, 2008 WI App 171 For Olson: Byron C. Lichstein Issue/Holding: The “act other than element” of § 948.075(3) isn’t satisfied by either transmission of live video of the shirtless defendant, or by his prior sexual encounters with others he met on-line: ¶11      Accordingly, we read the statute to require that… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS