7th circuit decision Habeas – Limits on Cros-Examination State court limitation on impeachment of a witness — so as to exclude that portion of a pre-trial conversation containing the defendant’s “self-serving,” thus inadmissible hearsay, statement — wasn’t an unreasonable application of controlling caselaw. Determination of whether “state interests, including those reflected in the state’s evidentiary… Read more
22. Habeas corpus
7th Circuit decision; on habeas review of Wis. opinion No. 2005AP2599-CR Habeas – Filing Deadline – Tolling The District Court had authority to grant Socha’s pre-filing, pre-deadline request to extend the 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) deadline for his habeas petition, made on the ground of equitable tolling. … First, there is no absolute bar imposed… Read more
John M. Stephenson v. Levenhagen, 7th Cir No. 09-2924, 08/26/2010 7th Cir decision; petition for rehearing denied 1/14/11, 3 dissents from denial of en banc review Habeas – Effective Assistance – Stun Belt Counsel’s failure to object to placement of stun belt on Stephenson during trial was held by the state court to be deficient: accepting… Read more
7th Cir. decision; Order denying rehearing and amending opinion, 10/10/15 Habeas – Voluntary Statement – Juvenile State court determination that juvenile’s custodial statement to police was voluntary wasn’t objectively unreasonable., notwithstanding his age (15), borderline intellectual functioning and lack of criminal background. “(I)t is the totality of the circumstances underlying a juvenile confession, rather than… Read more
2nd Circuit court of appeals decision Federal Habeas (28 U.S.C. § 2254) – Filing Deadline – Brady Claim The 2254 filing deadline is one year from the date the state-court conviction becomes “final,” subject to certain exceptions, including one which restarts the limitation period from “the date on which the factual predicate of the claim… Read more
7th circuit decision Habeas – Filing Deadline – DNA Motion as Tolling Price’s postconviction motion for DNA testing in Illinois state court didn’t toll the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 federal habeas deadline, and his habeas petition is therefore deemed untimely. The court’s analysis relates to Illinois procedure. As will be seen, Wisconsin’s is meaningfully different… Read more
Alan Ward v. Deppisch, 7th Cir No. 08-2809, 07/23/2010 7th circuit decision, review of unpublished court of appeals decision Habeas – Procedural Default The state argues that Ward procedurally defaulted his claim because he failed to fairly present the Wisconsin courts with a federal issue, and the state courts ruled against Ward based on adequate… Read more
seventh circuit decision; denial of rehearing and en banc, 10/28/10 Habeas – Filing Deadline For purposes of the federal habeas 1-year statute of limitations, a state court’s decision to accept an untimely filing makes the postconviction review “properly filed” but it doesn’t make it retrospectively “pending” so as to toll the limitation period. Griffith seeks… Read more
