≡ Menu

B. Selection process

court of appeals decision; for Sellhausen: Byron C. Lichstein; case activity Issues (formulated by On Point): Whether a trial judge has a sua sponte duty to strike a prosepctive juror who is an in-law of the judge. Whether defense counsel’s use of a peremptory strike to remove the judge’s in-law renders harmless any error in the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Sharon A. Sellhausen, 2010 WI App 175, reversed, 2012 WI 5; for Sellhausen: Byron C. Lichstein; case activity ¶1        Sharon Sellhausen appeals her jury conviction based on the presence of the presiding judge’s daughter-in-law on the panel of potential jurors.  The daughter-in-law was not seated on the jury because Sellhausen’s… Read more

{ 0 comments }

decision below:  unpublished summary disposition; for Funk: Michele Anne Tjader Issue (from Table of Pending Cases): Whether a juror was subjectively and/or objectively biased under the test set forth in State v. Delgado, 223 Wis. 2d 270, 588 N.W.2d 1 (1999). Briefs, appellate decision, petition for review: none is posted, so you can’t readily tell… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Habeas Review: Jury Selection Process

Berghuis v. Smith, USSC No. 08-1402, 3/30/10 Defendants have Sixth Amendment right to impartial jury drawn from fair cross section of community. To establish prima facie violation of this “fair-cross-section,” requirement, a defendant must prove that: (1) a group qualifying as “distinctive” (2) is not fairly and reasonably represented in jury venires, and (3) “systematic… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Thaler v. Haynes, USSC No. 09–273, 2/22/10 (per curiam) Nothing in Supreme Court caselaw clearly requires “that a demeanor-based explanation for a peremptory challenge must be rejected unless the judge personally observed and recalls the relevant aspect of the prospective juror’s demeanor.” In other words, there’s no requirement that the judge have been present during… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Mark H. Tody, 2009 WI 31, reversing unpublished opinion For Tody: Byron C. Lichstein, UW Law School Issue/Holding: ¶32      … The correct principle of law that should have guided the circuit court judge is that a circuit court judge should err on the side of dismissing a challenged juror when the challenged juror’s presence may… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Dale L. Smith, 2006 WI 74, affirming unpublished decision For Smith: Allison Ritter Issue/Holding: ¶16      The sole question we must address on appeal is whether Smith was denied the right to an impartial jury by the circuit court’s refusal to strikeCharlotte for cause. Smith argues that Charlotte should have been disqualified as objectively biased because… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Jury – Selection – “Batson” Issue

State v. George Melvin Taylor, 2004 WI App 81, PFR filed 4/13/04 For Taylor: Ellen Henak, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶18. Accordingly, we must now turn to the Batson challenge itself. Our supreme court has adopted the Batson principles and analysis. State v. Lamon, 2003 WI 78, ¶22, 262 Wis. 2d 747, 664 N.W.2d 607 (citing State v. Davidson, 166 Wis. 2d 35… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS