≡ Menu

5. 974.06, collateral attack

court of appeals decision (1-judge; not for publication); pro se; Resp. Br. Custody Requirement, sec. 974.06 ¶7        However, Olson is barred from collaterally attacking his criminal conviction under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 because he is no longer “‘in custody under sentence of a court.’”  See State v. Theoharopoulos, 72 Wis. 2d 327, 329, 240 N.W.2d 635… Read more

{ 0 comments }

court of appeals decision (3-judge; not recommended for publication); pro se; Resp. Br. Serial Litigation Bar Collins’ § 974.06 motion is procedurally barred by his failure to allege a “sufficient reason” for not previously raising issues as part of his prior, no-merit appeal, ¶1. Bit more interesting than that, in the following sense: the court… Read more

{ 1 comment }

State v. Clifford D. Bvocik, 2010 WI App 49; for Bvocik: James C. Murray Prosecutorial Misconduct – Closing Argument Improper prosecutorial closing argument—encouraging jury to draw false inference—requires new trial in interest of justice; State v. Robert H. Weiss, Jr., 2008 WI App 72, controlling: ¶1        State v. Weiss, 2008 WI App 72, ¶¶15-17, 312 Wis… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jeffrey A.W., 2010 WI App 29

court of appeals decision; for Jeffrey A.W.: Hans P. Koesser Resp Br; Reply Counsel – Adequacy of Investigation Attempt to demonstrate absence of herpes in defendant—an issue central to this sexual assault prosecution—was, although  failure, not product of deficient performance, ¶12: There is no question that trial counsel’s investigation yielded the wrong information. But that… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jeffrey A.W., 2010 WI App 29; for Jeffrey A.W.: Hans P. Koesser Adequacy of Counsel Investigation Counsel’s attempt to demonstrate the absence of herpes in the defendant—an issue central to this sexual assault prosecution—was, although a failure, not the product of deficient performance. ¶12  There is no question that trial counsel’s investigation yielded… Read more

{ 0 comments }

 State v. James D. Miller, 2009 WI App 111, PFR filed 8/3/09 Pro se Issue/Holding: Because sufficiency of evidence to sustain the conviction is a matter of constitutional dimension, it may be raised via § 974.06 motion, ¶¶25-30.The court’s discussion also indicates, at least implicitly, that the State v. Obea S. Hayes, 2004 WI 80… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. David R. Kaster, 2006 WI App 72, PFR filed 4/26/06; prior appeal: 2003 WI App 105 For Kaster: Robert R. Kaster Issue/Holding: ¶9 Kaster next argues that the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain the disorderly conduct charge. …. Kaster has not demonstrated a “sufficient reason” under § 974.06(4) to overcome the fact… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Thomas A. Mikulance, 2006 WI App 69 Pro se Issue/Holding: A “narrow” exception to the serial litigation bar of § 974.06(4) and State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 185, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994) is established by State v. Flowers, 221 Wis. 2d 20, 27, 586 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1998), which “applies… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS