≡ Menu

32. Prosecutor misconduct

Docket Decision below: State ex rel. Smith v. Cain, 992 So. 2d 928, 2008 La. LEXIS 1772 (La., 2008), writ denied State v. Smith, 2010 La. LEXIS 2202 (La., Sept. 24, 2010) Questions Presented (from SCOTUS docket page): In this Louisiana criminal case, the state trial court, the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal, and the Louisiana Supreme… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Machner Hearing; Mistrial

State v. Sidney Clark, 2010AP790, District 1, 2/23/11 court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Clark: John A. Pray; case activity Clark can’t show prejudice from the deficient performance he alleges, therefore he isn’t entitled to a Machner hearing on ineffective assistance of counsel. ¶21      A postconviction hearing is necessary to sustain a claim of… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Richard L. Daniels, 2010AP1715-CR, District 3, 2/23/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Daniels: John M. Carroll; case activity Ineffective Assistance of Counsel – Voluntary Intoxication Voluntary intoxication requires that the defendant establish utter lack of capability to form the requisite intent; because Daniels’ version couldn’t make this showing, counsel’s… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Miguel E. Marinez, Jr., 2011 WI 12, reversing unpublished decision; case activity; prior post; for Marinez: Ralph J. Sczygelski Evidence – Other-Acts, § 904.04(2) – “Sullivan” Analysis ¶19  To guide courts in determining whether other-acts evidence is admissible for a proper purpose under Wis. Stat. § 904.04(2)(a), we developed a three-prong test.  Sullivan, 216… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. William M. O’Donnell, 2009AP2962, District 2, 11/17/10 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for O’Donnell: Walter Arthur Piel, Jr.; O’Donnell BiC; State Resp.; Reply Because the evidence allegedly suppressed by the State wasn’t exculpatory, O’Donnell wasn’t entitled to an evidentiary on his postconviction motion asserting suppression of exculpatory material. ¶10      A circuit court, in… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Patrick R. Patterson, 2010 WI 130, affirming 2009 WI App 181; for Patterson: David R. Karpe; Patterson BiC; State Resp.; Reply Multiplicity – § 948.40(1) (4)(a) as Lesser Offense of § 940.02(2)(a) Contributing to the delinquency of a minor with death as a result, § 948.40(1), (4)(a) is not a lesser offense of first-degree… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Morris L. Harris, 2009AP2759-CR, District 1, 11/2/10 court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication); for Harris: Gary Grass; BiC; Resp.; Reply Guilty Plea – Withdrawal – Presentence The trial court properly applied the “fair and just reason” standard to Harris’s presentencing motion to withdraw guilty plea, ¶¶5-9. The particular grounds asserted… Read more

{ 0 comments }

7th circuit court of appeals decision Habeas – Napue Issue The Supreme Court has held that “a conviction obtained through use of false evidence, known to be such by representatives of the State, must fall under the Fourteenth Amendment.” Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 269 (1959) …. Thus, a new trial is required if… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS