≡ Menu

1. Consent

Consent – Authority: Driver, for Passenger

State v. Jordan A. Denk, 2008 WI 130, on certification For Denk: Lora B. Cerone, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶20 n. 4: … While Pickering could consent to a search of the vehicle, he could not consent to a search of his passenger. See State v. Matejka, 2001 WI 5, 241 Wis.  2d 52, 621 N.W.2d 891 (driver’s consent to search of… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Gary A. Johnson, 2007 WI 32, affirming 2006 WI App 15 For Johnson: Eileen A. Hirsch, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether Johnson’s statement, “I don’t have a problem with that,” made in response to an officer’s assertion that they were “going to search the vehicle” was voluntary consent or mere acquiescence. Holding: ¶19      As the record… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Roemie T. St. Germaine, 2007 WI App 214, PFR filed 9/27/07 For St. Germaine: Rex Anderegg Issue: Whether the owner of the residence (Briseno) had apparent authority to consent to police search of renter St. Germaine’s room, at least where St. Germaine was present was consent was sought and never objected. Holding: ¶17 St. Germaine… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. John J. Hartwig, 2007 WI App 160, PFR filed 5/22/07 For Hartwig: Wright C. Laufenberg Issue/Holding: The trial court misread State v. Reginald Jones, 2005 WI App 26, to hold that consent to search is invalid whenever the person has been seized; rather, that case holds only that consent may be invalid when made following illegal… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Consent — Absence of Coercion

State v. Philip R. Bons, 2007 WI App 124, PFR filed 4/24/07 For Bons: Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky Issue/Holding: ¶18      The State has satisfied its burden to show the consent was voluntary. There is no suggestion of misrepresentation, deception, trickery or intimidation. The officers did not use weapons or force or otherwise take custody of Bons. Bons… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Consent – Acquiescence – Generally

State v. Gary A. Johnson, 2007 WI 32, affirming 2006 WI App 15 For Johnson: Eileen A. Hirsch, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶16      When the purported legality of a warrantless search is based on the consent of the defendant, that consent must be freely and voluntarily given. State v. Phillips, 218 Wis. 2d 180, 197, 577 N.W.2d 794… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Consent — Acquiescence — Generally

State v. Jed A. Giebel, 2006 WI App 239 For Giebel: Robert E. Bellin, Jr. Issue/Holding: ¶12   The test for voluntariness asks whether consent was given in the “absence of actual coercive, improper police practices designed to overcome the resistance of a defendant.” State v. Clappes, 136 Wis.  2d 222, 245, 401 N.W.2d 759 (1987). In making… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jed A. Giebel, 2006 WI App 239 For Giebel: Robert E. Bellin, Jr. Issue: Whether Giebel’s “consent” to a search of his computer, in response to a police claim of a subpoena and accompanied by an expression that Giebel assumed he had no choice, was voluntary or mere acquiescence to asserted police authority. Holding: ¶17… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS