≡ Menu

H. Exclusionary rule

Warrants – Good-Faith Exception

State v. Rayshun D. Eason, 2001 WI 98, reversing State v. Rayshun D. Eason, 2000 WI App 73, 234 Wis. 2d 396, 610 N.W.2d 208 For Eason: Suzanne Hagopian, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether evidence obtained after entry of a home in violation of the announcement rule, because authorization was provided by an invalid no-knock warrant, is… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Wilton Tye, 2001 WI 124 For Tye: Mark D. Richards, Christy M. Hall Issue: Whether evidence seized under a search warrant, invalid on its face because unsupported by oath or affirmation, is covered by the good faith exception. Holding: ¶24. Fourth and finally, the State asks this court to allow admission of the seized… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Bill Paul Marquardt, 2001 WI App 219, PFR filed 9/20/01 For Marquardt: James B. Connell Issue: Whether evidence seized under a warrant defective because unsupported by probable cause may be admissible under the good-faith doctrine. Holding: Given that, subsequent to trial-level litigation, the supreme court recognized the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule, in State v… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Robert F. Hart, 2001 WI App 283 For Hart: John Deitrich Issue: Whether a person voluntarily abandons property when throwing it to the ground during an illegal pat-down. Holding: ¶24. Our own research has uncovered cases that are fatal to the district attorney’s contention. In Lawrence v. Henderson, 478 F. 2d 705, 708 (5th Cir… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Attenuation of Taint — Consent

State v. David L. Munroe, 2001 WI App 104 For Munroe: Peter Koneazny, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue: Whether consent to search was valid notwithstanding illegal police activity. Holding: ¶13. The three factors that help to determine whether the taint of earlier illegal police activity has been attenuated by the time a consent to search is granted… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Debra Noble, 2002 WI 64, reversing 2001 WI App 145, 246 Wis. 2d 533, 629 N.W.2d 31 For Noble: Thomas H. Boyd Issue/Holding: Suppression of evidence is required only where it has been obtained in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights or of a statute specifically providing for suppression as a remedy. ¶14. Issue: Whether, assuming… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Albert Jackowski, 2001 WI App 187 For Jackowski: Ronald C. Shiroka Issue: Whether violation of a statutory requirement for issuance of a building inspection warrant (namely, the § 66.0119(2) condition that such a warrant be issued only upon showing that consent to enter was refused) supports suppression of evidence obtained after entry under the warrant. Holding… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Lance R. Ward, 2000 WI 3, 231 Wis.2d 723, 604 N.W.2d 517, reversing State v. Ward, 222 Wis. 2d 311, 588 N.W.2d 645.For Ward: Daniel P. Dunn Issue: Whether the exclusionary rule applies where the police relied on judge-made law that automatically countenanced all no-knock entries to search for drugs and that law… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS