≡ Menu

c. Duration

State v. Guy W. Colstad, 2003 WI App 25 For Colstad: T. Christopher Kelly Issue/Holding: Prolonged detention of the driver at the scene of a fatal accident did not transmute a temporary stop into an arrest: ¶17 Colstad argues that the duration of his detention was unreasonable because the officer directed him to wait, instead of… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Bradley J. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105, reversing 2001 WI App 43 For Vorburger: David D. Cook Issue1: Whether the detention of suspect Becker in a motel hallway, while the police sought and then executed a search warrant for a room, was unnecessarily prolonged so as to amount to an arrest (unsupported by probable cause), where Becker was… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Vernell T. Williams, 2002 WI App 306 For Williams: Michael A. Haakenson Issue: Whether a stop whose purpose (to investigate possible connection to an earlier crime) had dissipated was unlawfully prolonged by a checking the driver’s license. Holding: ¶19. In State v. Ellenbecker, 159 Wis. 2d 91, 464 N.W.2d 427 (Ct. App. 1990), we held… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Vernell T. Williams, 2002 WI App 306 For Williams: Michael A. Haakenson Issue/Holding: ¶24. It is true that when an officer has fulfilled the purpose of a lawful stop, the officer’s request for permission to search the vehicle does not, in itself, transform the stop into an unlawful one. State v. Gaulrapp, 207 Wis… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Vernell T. Williams, 2002 WI App 306 For Williams: Michael A. Haakenson Issue/Holding: Request to search car after purpose of lawful, routine traffic stop satisfied doesn’t make stop unlawful; validity turns on fact-specific inquiry. ¶¶24-25… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Charles A. Wallace, 2002 WI App 61 For Wallace: Martha K. Askins, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether an arrest for a traffic stop, lawful at inception, was unlawfully prolonged in order to obtain the driver’s consent to a strip search not reasonably related to the traffic violation. Holding: This issue is “closely related” to one… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Kelsey C.R., 2001 WI 54 For Kelsey C. R.: Susan Alesia, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether Kelsey’s detention was prolonged beyond its proper purpose. Holding: The operative principle is settled: “an investigative detention … must last only long enough to fulfill the purpose of the stop.” ¶44. Applying that principle — (3-vote lead opinion:) The… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Christopher Gammons, 2001 WI App 36 For Gammons: Keith A. Findley, LAIP Issue/Holding: Police did not have reasonable suspicion to continued detention for a routine traffic problem after the purpose of the stop was fulfilled: ¶21 In evaluating reasonable suspicion, we must examine whether all the facts, when taken together, could constitute a… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS