≡ Menu

D. Type of punishment

State v. Edward W. Johnson, Jr., 2002 WI App 166 For Johnson: Robert T. Ruth Issue/Holding: Because record is clear that trial court ordered restitution, court of appeals refuses to recharacterize (and uphold) order as condition of probation: ¶25                        As a final argument, the State contends that even if W.L.’s wages are not recoverable under WIS. STAT. § 973.20, the circuit court… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Restitution — Limitations — Time Limit

State v. Edward W. Johnson, Jr., 2002 WI App 166 For Johnson: Robert T. Ruth Issue: Whether delay of 18 months in setting restitution amount deprived court of jurisdiction to enter the restitution order. Holding: Statutory time limits for setting restitution are regulatory, not jurisdictional, and may be exceeded when there is a valid reason and no prejudice… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Restitution — Limitations — Time Limit

State v. Jeffrey Kenneth Krohn, 2002 WI App 96 Issue: Whether the remedy for a conceded violation in following statutory procedure, including time limit, in determining restitution amount is remand for a restitution hearing under proper procedure. Holding: ¶13 While we accept Krohn’s challenge to the circuit court’s restitution order, we reject his attempt to prevent the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Edward W. Johnson, Jr., 2002 WI App 166 For Johnson: Robert T. Ruth Issue/Holding: Wages lost by a stepparent’s accompanying the victim to court aren’t subject to restitution; lost wages are limited to those persons identified in § 973.20(5)(b). ¶¶22-23. Issue/Holding: A stepparent is not victim for § 973.20(1r) restitution purposes, ¶¶17-19. (However, a stepparent may qualify as an… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. James N. Storlie, 2002 WI App 163 For Storlie: William E. Schmaal, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether the destruction of “stop sticks” caused by defendant’s flight from the police is properly subject to a restitution order. Holding: ¶10…. (T)he government is entitled to restitution for losses incurred when it is a victim as a direct… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Joseph A. Kayon, 2002 WI App 178 For Kayon: Ronald J. Sonderhouse Issue/Holding: Both the replacement cost of a television stolen by the defendant, and rental fees of a television while the case was pending, may be recovered in restitution. The rental fees represent “loss of use” damage that could be claimed in a civil action… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. William A. Rouse, 2002 WI App 107, PFR filed 5/8/02 For Rouse: Morris D. Berman Issue/Holding: Time spent by a bank’s salaried employees investigating the crime (forgery) is subject to restitution because, while the bank’s employees were investigating Rouse’s forgeries, they were prevented from doing other work for the bank, and thus the bank… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Kirk J. Bergquist, 2002 WI App 39 For Berhquist: Steven H. Gibbs Issue: Whether the state’s refusal to return guns valued at between $5000 and $7,150, following conviction for disorderly conduct, violated the Eighth Amendment Excessive Fines Clause. Holding: ¶8. Although the term “forfeiture” does not appear in this statute, our supreme court has… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS