≡ Menu

6. Restitution

State v. Mark M. Loutsch, 2003 WI App 16, PFR filed 1/17/03; X-PFR filed 1/31/03 For Loutsch: Charles B. Vetzner Issue/Holding: ¶25. Read together, these sections plainly contemplate that the court order at sentencing an amount of restitution that it determines the defendant will be able to pay before the completion of the sentence-in this case… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Restitution – Discovery, § 973.20(14)(d)

State v. Edward W. Johnson, Jr., 2002 WI App 166 For Johnson: Robert T. Ruth Issue/Holding: Where restitution was for counseling expenses, Johnson failed to show good cause for discovery of her counseling records. ¶¶28-30… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Edward W. Johnson, Jr., 2002 WI App 166 For Johnson: Robert T. Ruth Issue/Holding: Because record is clear that trial court ordered restitution, court of appeals refuses to recharacterize (and uphold) order as condition of probation: ¶25                        As a final argument, the State contends that even if W.L.’s wages are not recoverable under WIS. STAT. § 973.20, the circuit court… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Restitution — Limitations — Time Limit

State v. Edward W. Johnson, Jr., 2002 WI App 166 For Johnson: Robert T. Ruth Issue: Whether delay of 18 months in setting restitution amount deprived court of jurisdiction to enter the restitution order. Holding: Statutory time limits for setting restitution are regulatory, not jurisdictional, and may be exceeded when there is a valid reason and no prejudice… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Restitution — Limitations — Time Limit

State v. Jeffrey Kenneth Krohn, 2002 WI App 96 Issue: Whether the remedy for a conceded violation in following statutory procedure, including time limit, in determining restitution amount is remand for a restitution hearing under proper procedure. Holding: ¶13 While we accept Krohn’s challenge to the circuit court’s restitution order, we reject his attempt to prevent the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Edward W. Johnson, Jr., 2002 WI App 166 For Johnson: Robert T. Ruth Issue/Holding: Wages lost by a stepparent’s accompanying the victim to court aren’t subject to restitution; lost wages are limited to those persons identified in § 973.20(5)(b). ¶¶22-23. Issue/Holding: A stepparent is not victim for § 973.20(1r) restitution purposes, ¶¶17-19. (However, a stepparent may qualify as an… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. James N. Storlie, 2002 WI App 163 For Storlie: William E. Schmaal, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether the destruction of “stop sticks” caused by defendant’s flight from the police is properly subject to a restitution order. Holding: ¶10…. (T)he government is entitled to restitution for losses incurred when it is a victim as a direct… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Joseph A. Kayon, 2002 WI App 178 For Kayon: Ronald J. Sonderhouse Issue/Holding: Both the replacement cost of a television stolen by the defendant, and rental fees of a television while the case was pending, may be recovered in restitution. The rental fees represent “loss of use” damage that could be claimed in a civil action… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS