≡ Menu

3. Harsh and excessive

State v. Todd W. Berggren, 2009 WI App 82, PFR filed 6/24/09 For Berggren: Robert G. LeBell Issue/Holding: Initial confinement totaling 36, and supervision of 17, years on sexual assault-related convictions wasn’t harsh and excessive: ¶48      Berggren’s sentence was not shocking, nor does it violate the judgment of reasonable people concerning what is right and proper under… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Anthony L. Prineas, 2009 WI App 28 For Prineas: Raymond M. Dall’Osto, Kathryn A. Keppel Issue/Holding: Prineas was convicted on 2 counts of 2nd-degree sexual assault, and acquitted on another 4; the PSI recommended 6-8 years, but he was sentenced to 10 IC, 10 ES and a concurrent 30-year term of probation; though a… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Donald W. Thexton, 2007 WI App 11, PFR filed 1/02/07 For Thexton: Kirk B. Obear Issue/Holding: Sentence of 13 years (3 IC; 10 ES) for sexual contact was not harsh and excessive, notwithstanding closeness in age between defendant and underage victim: ¶12      As to excessiveness, Thexton notes that he was close in age to the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Jack W. Klubertanz, 2006 WI App 71, PFR filed 4/14/06 For Klubertanz: Martha K. Askins, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether attack on a sentence as harsh and excessive is limited to factors present at the time of sentencing, or may instead be based on post-sentencing events such that as in this instance a claim that… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Germaine M. Taylor, 2006 WI 22, affirming unpublished summary order For Taylor: Martha K. Askins, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: TIS sentence of 18 years (12 in, 6 out) for child sexual assault, consecutive to 5 year indeterminate sentence for similar offense, was not harsh and excessive, notwithstanding PSI recommendation of 12 years (6 in, 6 out)… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Wallace I. Stenzel, 2004 WI App 181 For Stenzel: Martin E. Kohler Issue/Holding: ¶21. Finally, Stenzel asserts that the court erroneously exercised its discretion because the sentence is unduly harsh and unconscionable. When a defendant argues that his or her sentence is unduly harsh or excessive, we will hold that the sentencing court… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Richard G.B., 2003 WI App 13, PFR filed 1/13/03 For Richard G.B.: Bridget E. Boyle Issue/Holding: Sentence of 18 years for sexual assault of a child (mouth-vagina intercourse with 15 year-old niece) wasn’t harsh and excessive, measured against a maximum possible sentence of 20 years. Trial court also “articulated its reasoning for the sentence… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Peter C. Ramuta, 2003 WI App 80, PFR filed 4/3/03 For Ramuta: Peter M. Koneazny, Richard D. Martin, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue/Holding: Sentence of initial confinement of 35 years not excessive: ¶25. Although we recognize that trial courts should impose “‘the minimum amount of custody'” consistent with the appropriate sentencing facts, State v. Hall, 2002… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS