≡ Menu

5. Inaccurate information

State v. Jeffrey R. Groth, 2002 WI App 299, PFR filed 12/11/02 For Groth: Peter Koneazny, Randall E. Paulson, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶22. A defendant who asks for resentencing because the court relied on inaccurate information must show both that the information was inaccurate and that the court relied on it. Id. The defendant… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Anthony J. Leitner, 2001 WI App 172, affirmed on other grds., 2002 WI 77, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341 For Leitner: Jim Scott Issue: Whether the defendant waived his right to object to trial court reliance on certain information by failing to lodge a contemporaneous objection. Holding: ¶41 … When the prosecutor subsequently argued… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Stanley A. Samuel, 2001 WI App 25, 240 Wis. 2d 756, 623 N.W.2d 565, affirmed, other grounds, 2002 WI 34 For Samuel: Robert R. Henak Issue: Whether the defendant waived objection to the sentencing court’s reliance on information sealed from the defendant’s inspection. Holding: ¶42 We accept the State’s waiver argument. First, just because the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Dione Wendell Haywood, 2009 WI App 178 For Haywood: Robert E. Haney Issue/Holding: Asserted prosecutorial misconduct, in the form of misleading statements during allocution, is tested under State v. Wolff, 171 Wis. 2d 161, 167, 491 N.W.2d 498, 501 (Ct. App. 1992) (whether “what the prosecutor does has ‘so infected the trial with unfairness as to make… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS