≡ Menu

Uncategorized

A new order from the 7th Circuit provides that oral arguments scheduled through January 31st will be argued telephonically or by video. Counsel also has the option of waiving oral argument. Will SCOW follow suit… Read more

{ 0 comments }

State v. Dallas R. Christel, 2020AP1127-1128-Cr, 12/8/21, District 2 (not recommended for publication); case activity (including briefs) Christel argued that §940.235, which criminalizes strangulation and suffocation, (1) violates substantive due process on its face and as applied to him, (2) is overbroad, and (3) is void for vagueness. He also argued for a new-factor-based sentence… Read more

{ 1 comment }

State v. Anne E. Streckenbach, 2020AP345-CR, 12/7/21, District 3, (1-judge opinion, ineligible for publication); case activity (including briefs) When a cop stopped Streckenbach for a traffic violation he observed signs of intoxication. He asked her the 24 questions that appear the DOT’s Alcohol/Drug Influence Report–questions that are usually asked after the driver has been arrested… Read more

{ 1 comment }

This week the Wisconsin Supreme Court hears oral argument in 5 cases concerning public defense. They raise some hot-button issues. Here are the cases, issues, and the times for the arguments, which you can watch on Wisconsineye.org: Wednesday, December 8th 9:45  State v. Christopher W. Yakich: When a defendant has been found not guilty by… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Portage County v. C.K.S., 2021AP1291-FT, 11/24/21, District 4, (1-judge opinion, ineligible for publication); case activity The circuit court recommitted C.K.S. but apparently neglected to specify the applicable standard(s) of dangerousness. C.K.S. appealed arguing that the court violated D.J.W. and that the county’s evidence of dangerousness was insufficient. The court of appeals declined to address the… Read more

{ 0 comments }

A new guide for clients who are committed

Have your mentally ill clients been denied medication or over-medicated? Have they been placed in seclusion or denied access to a phone or to interpreters? Section 51.61 establishes “patients rights” for persons receiving services for mental illness, developmental disabilities, or drug dependency, pursuant to Chapters 48, 51, 55, 971, 975 or 980. When your client… Read more

{ 0 comments }

When allies on SCOW disagree

Since 2019, SCOW’s most steadfast liberal allies are Justices A.W. Bradley and Dallet. Its most conspicuous conservative allies are Justices Roggensack and Ziegler. SCOWstats’ latest post takes a peek at cases where these allies have disagreed… Read more

{ 0 comments }

Nelson Garcia, Jr. v. Brian Foster, 20-CV-335 (E.D. Wis. 11/9/21). Garcia challenged his robbery conviction on two grounds. (1) He was denied his right to counsel at a post-arrest police line up. (2) He was denied his right to go pro se at trial. While habeas wins are rare, what’s most remarkable is how blatantly… Read more

{ 0 comments }
RSS