Exigency — Blood Alcohol — Reasonableness of Procedure

by admin on February 18, 2003

State v. James S. Riedel, 2003 WI App 18, PFR filed 1/27/03
For Riedel: Ralph A. Kalal

Issue/Holding: Police not required to obtain warrant in order to test blood seized pursuant to Implied Consent Law; State v. VanLaarhoven, 2001 WI App 275 extended (VanLaarhoven consented to initial seizure, Riedel didn’t). ¶¶11-16.

{ 0 comments… add one }

Next post: Exigency — Blood Alcohol — Probable Cause as Substitute for Actual Arrest

Previous post: Non-Support, § 948.22 – Statute of Limitations — Support Arrearages, § 893.40 – Accrual upon Entry of Support Judgment

Exigency — Blood Alcohol — Reasonableness of Procedure

Contact Us

Disclaimer