OWI, § 346.63(1)(am) – Elements, Proof of “Impairment” Not Necessary

by admin on February 3, 2005

State v. Joseph L. Smet, 2005 WI App 263
For Smet: Christopher A. Mutschler

Issue/Holding: Proof of “impairment” is not a necessary element of § 346.63, ¶¶12-16.

Section 346.63(1)(am) (driving under influence of detectable amount of THC, regardless of impairment) is constitutional as against police power, due process, and equal protection attack, ¶¶6.

{ 0 comments… add one }

Next post: § 940.22(2), Sexual Exploitation by Therapist – Clergy as “Therapist,” Jury Instructions

Previous post: Defenses – § 948.03(2)(b) (2001-02), Harm to Child – Defense of Parental Privilege, § 939.45(5)

OWI, § 346.63(1)(am) – Elements, Proof of “Impairment” Not Necessary

Contact Us

Disclaimer