court of appeals decision (3-judge; not recommended for publication); Resp. Br; Reply Br
Exculpatory Material
Defense had access to assertedly suppressed exculpatory material, hence no Brady violation.
Effective Assistance
Counsel had valid tactical reason for cross-examination approach; failure to file discovery demand, object to certain testimony: “The defendant must affirmatively prove prejudice. … Walker has not even attempted to do so. Therefore, his claim fails.”
