prior post: here; background summary by court: here
Issues (from Table of Cases):
Whether a pattern jury instruction confused or mislead a jury such that the instructions violated a defendant’s due process rights.
Whether a trial court erred in its handling of a jury’s questions during deliberations.
Whether particular evidence constituted substantial facts sufficient to corroborate the defendant’s alleged statements under the corroboration rule (See State v. Bannister, 2007 WI 86, ¶26, 302 Wis. 2d 158, 734 N.W.2d 892).
