State v. William J. Zarda, 2011AP386-CR, District 3, 5/17/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Zarda: Ricky Cveykus; case activity
Under settled authority, the disorderly conduct statute, § 947.01, is neither overbroad (¶5, citing State v. Douglas D., 2001 WI 47, 243 Wis. 2d 204, 626 N.W.2d 725); nor vague (¶6, citing State v. Zwicker, 41 Wis. 2d 497, 164 N.W.2d 512 (1969)); nor unconstitutional as applied (¶7: he cursed at his ex-girlfriend in a store, confronted her husband in the parking lot, and caused her children to become “hysterical”); nor underbroad (¶8, citing Douglas D.).
